Comparison between the Canon 5d Mark IV and the Sony A7s II

These two effects have a reputation for being a bit unmanageable, and both contain more color shifting than a beginner colorist would be able to cope with well. Although they are probably not the most flattering or flexible of the alternatives available, individuals with a little expertise or daring may find enjoyment in editing the log photographs captured by the Sony a7S II camera. The recorded picture seems to be completely flat, but it may be selectively re-saturated and re-contrasted at a later time. All of the cameras had overall dynamic ranges that are within a half-stop of each other, according to DXOMark’s measurements.
The overall judgments of some of the most prominent camera review websites are summarized in the table to the right of this paragraph (amateurphotographer , cameralabs , digitalcameraworld , dpreview , ephotozine , photographyblog ). As can be seen, the expert reviewers generally agree on the overall quality of various cameras, although their ratings may vary in certain instances, emphasizing the previous argument that choosing a camera is typically a highly personal decision. And, although the 5D Mark IV may not have as many focusing points as some of its rivals, its 61-point system with 41 cross-type sensors is both quick and precise, making it a good all-around camera. Furthermore, with Canon’s Dual Pixel AF technology, you receive phase-detection points on the image sensor, resulting in even quicker performance. When compared to contrast detection autofocus systems, phase detection autofocus systems are far quicker.
The ability to do so is made possible by the fact that each pixel has two photodiodes, allowing each picture to have two separate copies of the same pixel, each with a different focus point. If you have a picture that is a little fuzzy, this feature will come in handy very quickly. In fact, even when the ISO is pushed to its maximum range, this Canon delivers images with great picture clarity, a wide dynamic range, and low noise levels. Apart from the fact that it is the first time that Nikon FX cameras have used a BSI CMOS sensor, the new Expeed 5 image processor provides quicker performance than its predecessor, the Expeed 4, which Nikon D810 users are already familiar with as being lightning rapid.
Several contemporary cameras are not only capable of shooting still photographs, but they are also capable of recording short films. In addition to having sensors with rapid readout periods for moving photos, the cameras under consideration have the same movie requirements (4K/30p).. The following side-by-side comparison demonstrates the physical dimensions and weight of the Canon 5D Mark IV and the Sony A7S II cameras, respectively. The two cameras are given in the order in which they are most closely related in size. Three sequential perspectives are displayed, from the front, from the top, and from the back.
Canon’s 5D Mark IV is a relatively new model that is included in the company’s current product lineup. The A7S II, on the other hand, has been phased out of production (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). In this way, the photographer may film time lapse sequences of natural phenomena such as flower blossoming and sunsets and moon rises without the need to invest in an additional camera trigger and associated software. Both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors, which are the most advanced technology available.
In terms of market positioning, retail prices in effect at the time of the camera’s introduction situate it in the market in relation to other models in the manufacturer’s line-up and the competitors. The A7S II was introduced at a somewhat cheaper price than the 5D Mark IV, making it more appealing to photographers working on a restricted budget. Typically, retail prices remain close to the launch price for the first few months, but after a few months, reductions become available.
In this brief beginning photography video, you’ll learn how to take crisp photographs in camera and without the need of post-processing software. This means that whatever you’re shooting, this camera will provide you with the highest possible opportunity of catching it in focus on the first try. The hybrid autofocus technology of the A7R II, which features 399 phase-detect AF points, is perhaps the camera’s most impressive feature. A quicker maximum shutter speed helps you to capture images of fast-moving subjects without the images becoming blurry. When you use autofocus tracking, after you have chosen your subject and pressed the shutter release halfway down, the autofocus will follow your subject as it moves.
There are several workarounds for bad color science, such as shooting pp8 with a s gamut cine 2 or 3 (I believe). Batteries are modest and the only weak aspect; it simply needs an additional $140 investment for two strong ones; I have four in total and never run out; batteries in general last longer than I anticipated. I still have my 5d2 and Canon c300, but I prefer the sony a7sii over the Canon c300 because it is that much better, yes it is that nice. However, the Sony A7S II LCD screen offers a Tilting function that allows you to adjust the angle of the screen in order to make shooting from waist or above-the-head levels more comfortable and convenient. In contrast, the Canon 5D MIV has a fixed-type screen, which means that it offers less versatility in terms of shooting positions when compared to the A7S II.
Therefore, there are no objective victors and losers in this competition; instead, there are simply possibilities for the discriminating shooter. Below is a side-by-side comparison of the technical specifications of the two cameras, which should help you quickly assess their differences and similarities. The 5D Mark IV has a better resolution than the A7S II (30.1MP), however the individual pixels on the 5D Mark IV are smaller (pixel pitch of 5.36mm against 8.40mm on the A7S II) and hence has a smaller sensor. The 5D Mark IV, on the other hand, is a little more current model than the A7S II, and its sensor may have benefited from technical advancements that have occurred since then that have increased the light collecting capacity of its pixels.
It is possible that more battery power indicates greater battery longevity. For the sake of argument, given how many people on this subreddit truly dislike Canon and their product line, I’ll say this: At work, we utilize Canon equipment for the majority of our shoots, mostly due to the ease of use and dependability of the equipment. Canon C series and 5dmkIII cameras are the most common models we utilize.
Find out if the two cameras are among the best in their respective categories in the most recent Best DSLR Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera rankings.
sony a7s ii